We have seen Presiden't Bush's despicable smear calling Obama an appeaser because of his desire to talk with Iran.
Although commentators from both the left and right are already calling Bush out on his hypocricy because of his policy of talking to Syria and North Korea (for example, see the video of both Pat Buchanan and Harold Ford talking about this here: <iframe height="339" width="425" src="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22425001/vp/24647139#24647139" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"></iframe>,
no one is paying attention to the fact that if Obama was President in 2003, Hezbollah would never have been able to get the weapons it used to bludgeon Israel in the 2005 war.
Without Bush's invasion of Iraq, this weapons supply route is just not possible:
The bottom line is that Saddam would never have allowed Shiite militias to smuggle weapons through Iraq for any reason, even if it was to attack Israel.
I hope that anyone who cares about Israel is made aware of this fact and tha the best way to keep Israel safe is to elect someone who had the judgement to oppose foreign policy moves that have so recklessly endangered Israel's security.
Just remember that appeaser #1 is the GOP and their Bush/McCain war: