Can someone explain this to me...
Geoff Garin states:
"We are not oblivious to the environment in which we are operating," said strategist Geoff Garin.
He went on to compare the contest to a tennis match -- of course, a best of five set men's tennis match.
"If someone was down a few games in the third set, I think you would be disappointed if the person walked off the court," Garin said.
"And sometimes even when people are down two sets to love and down a couple of games in the third set, they end up winning by the fifth set," he added.
Now, we've heard these sports analogies coming from the Clinton campaign before (often, really). What I'd like to know is how are these analogies logical?
Seriously. Wouldn't it be more like, "Well, we're down 9-2 in the bottom of the 9th inning, it's their ball, but if an alien spaceship came along and zapped every one of their players, maybe they'd forfeit the game."
I'm confused by these illogical analogies and don't know why they're not confronted (that I know of) by the MSM.