In what should come as a bit of a surprise (I personally thought FOX was taking the 'we shall never speak of this again' approach) Bill O'Reilly intentionally made a reference to FOX News' now infamous photoshopping of New York Times writers.
Bill O'Reilly said that people who reacted unfavorably to a News Network deliberately altering photographs to suit their partisan purposes are involved in "perhaps the most hypocritical situation we have ever seen". Whats his argument? O'Reilly says the New York Times was guilty of the same thing when they used cartoon images of O'Reilly in a book review segment of 'Culture Warrior'. Here is the image O'Reilly is referencing:
http://images.huffingtonpost.com/...
and here are the images of FOX's edited photos:
http://mediamatters.org/...
http://mediamatters.org/...
The same thing? Not even close. I think reasonable people that know SOMETHING about journalism can tell the difference between putting up art of O'Reilly for a book review piece and deliberately distorting real images without disclosure.
Watch the clip below and weigh in with your opinion: