Several weeks ago, Jane threw in her lot with Grover Norquist to defeat the healthcare bill.
But apparently, she didn't mean it. Because now, her website FireDogLake wants Martha Coakley in the Senate so that Coakley's 60th vote will allow the bill to pass—a bill that Jane detested.
Maybe that bill wasn't so bad after all, Jane? Perhaps you were manipulating your readers and the rest of the blogosphere with your "Look At Me" histrionics? Because you can't be for the bill now when you teamed up with Grover Norquist just a few weeks ago to defeat it. The election of Scott Brown will accomplish the EXACT same thing that your unholy union with Grover was meant to accomplish.
I actually know Grover, Jane. Tip: he's out to promote himself even more than you are. But you went there with him, and now you want us all to think you were just kidding.
So which is it, Jane? We should do everything we can to defeat this bill, including teaming up with Greasy Grover? Or we should do everything we can to elect Saint Martha, because we need to protect Obama and any semblance of our plan?
I'm not fooled. You jerked us all around, and proved that you will say Anything. So now, what you say means Nothing.
I'll hold my nose and vote for Coakley tomorrow, but not because you urged me to, Jane. I'll vote for her only because she's not as bad as Scott Brown. Perfect is the enemy of Good, Jane. Learn that sometime.
And I'll never take FDL seriously again. Good luck, Jane, and get ready for a long, steaming dump of blame, of which you can savor every dripping lump.