Many good D's have been written today; about the Bain issues of Mitt Romney. It is All over the press at the NY Times, Washington Post, L.A. Times and many more. Many of those entities are using the story to take a whack at both Mitt Romney and President Obama. The worst is the faux pas by Cory Booker statement that it is not proper to attack equity companies. Making those highly publicized remarks into a disdain of the attack on Bain is Steven Rattner's pathetic betrayal of the Obama Administration he once was given a privilege to serve.
According to ABC/ Yahoo News story "Obama campaign's -- ad - Romney --'vampire'" quoting an MSNBC interview - Steven Rattner said that he thinks the Obama Campaign ad are "UNfair". As he specifically is quoted as stating;
Steven Rattner, dubbed the "Car Czar" because he oversaw the Administration's automobile industry overhaul. Interviewed on MSNBC, the investment banker and private equity financier bluntly declared "I think the ad is unfair." Noting the video's focus on lost jobs, Rattner said "this is part of capitalism, this is part of life, and
I don't think there's anything Bain Capital did
that they need to be embarrassed about."
emphasis added
........
You are going to retract or eat your words Mr. Rattner!
Proof Romney Camp Is Lying About His Leaving Bain in 1999
.
FULL Disclosure
I have my own personally history with Mitt Romney's Bain and Goldman Sachs. They stole our company eToys - by federal frauds. Akin to the Madoff and Tom Petters case, we have been trying to get main stream to tell the story for a decade. They, along with many legal professionals who wish to Protect crimes going on in our federal courts; simply reject Black & White evidence in the Public Docket Records.
You can see my previous D's or go online and see my Declarations Under Penalty of Perjury at various websites;
http://www.petters-fraud.com
http://www.laserhaas.wordpress.com
and
http://www.bankruptcymisconduct.com/...
Yesterday, in a late (Sunday) release. I documented the facts (again) that Mitt Romney's camp is engaged in deceptions about the fact that Mitten's left Bain in 1999.
They HAVE to lie; despite the fact that is easily documented that Mitt Romney was still CEO of Bain Capital until August 2001. Their own attorney stipulated as much - with a bogus disclaimer that Romney was there in a "limited" capacity - in 2001.
You can see the Diary with overwhelming and irrefutable proof here;
http://www.dailykos.com/...
Bain Capital Continuously Engages In Federal Fraud
There's no longer any way possible, for Mitt Romney to substantiate the bogus contention that he vacated Bain Capital in 1999. There's simply too much proof by public records out there. SEC, NY Times, Boston Globe and even Mitt Romney/ Bain's own attorneys who denoted he was still CEO until 2001. While they contend he "really" did not have control of what is going on.
So, you ask what they are trying so hard to hide -
I'll tell you and show you in the days and weeks to come. But let me start with this. Take a look at the websites denoted above. They have vast links to public documents germane. It is a fact that Bain has benefited from state, federal and SEC frauds vast. So much so, that their (secret) attorneys have already confessed (in part).
Here's a chart showing the problem's Mitten's and Bain have;
Bain bought Kay Bee Toys in late 2000. Then Kay Bee Toys bought eToys in mid 2001. But before eToys was sold to Bain/ Kay Bee - Bain's law firm Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnel (www.MNAT.com ) LIED to a Chief Federal Justice to become the eToys federal estate Debtor's attorney. This is Illegal. Then the Creditors attorney (Paul Traub) lied about his connections to Bain/ Kay Bee. To make sure they seized the entire estate - Paul Traub and MNAT then put Paul Traub's (secret) partner - Mr. Barry Gold - in as eToys President/ CEO.
CRIMES Compounded by Conspiracy & Collusion to Defraud Federal Estate
Mr. Traub and Mr. Gold worked with Michael Glazer at Stage Stores bankruptcy. Michael Glazer is CEO of Kay Bee Toys. Then they all sold eToys assets (their client) to Bain/ Kay Bee (their secret clients).
These are federal crimes massive. They are also a state crimes against Delaware, Virgina, New York and California (where eToys had interests and employees). These massive crimes, worth more than $1 Billion - transpired in 2001. Complicating those even worse, we have frauds in multiple courts in Delaware, Pennsylvania, California and New York. All of which are made extensively heinous and egregious because MNAT is also Goldman Sachs attorney in Delaware. They lied about that too - but we have since forced them to confess.
Intolerably and Inexplicably - Goldman Sachs attorney's (MNAT) have deliberately sold out their court approved client (eToys) to their UNdisclosed clients (Bain/ KB) while helping to destroy eToys. Thus helping their secret client - Goldman Sachs - Too!
Bain's Attorneys - MNAT- Destroyed Evidence and Obstructed Justice
.
Just to make sure all the evidence is destroyed, while Lying under oath, MNAT asked for and received - Permission to Destroy the Books n Records of eToys. Helping both Bain and Goldman Sachs frauds. (See document proof in NY Supreme Ct (here)).
.
.
Conclusion - Mr. Rattner Must Redact His Remarks
It is tell-tale by the very fact that Mitt Romney's campaign is working so hard to propogate falsehoods, that they are scared of anything tying Mitt Romney to Bain in 2000 & 2001. The fact of the matter is, Mitt Romney has already confessed that he is continuously getting millions from Bain. Thus, if Bain benefited from federal fraud - even if Romney is able to lie his way out and dodge 2001 - he is still benefiting from Bain's actions.
I leave you with this video of Mr. Steven Rattner's remarks. I reached out (as best anyone can these days) to get him to respond on the Bain remarks and warned him with this to his website http://stevenrattner.com/... - where I stated this;
Dear Mr. Rattner;
I am about to publish some stories on our website and blogs that will feature your remarks that
"I don't think there's anything Bain Capital did that they need to be embarrassed about"
Such a statement is deeply errant, lacking in qualitative veracity. Thus, I am giving you a chance to retract your remarks and offer you irrefutable proof as to the reasons why.
You can go to my website and online Declarations under penalty of perjury.
You have a short time to respond - as your remarks have done much damage (evident by the attention you are getting).
I will - of course - update the articles when (if) you do respond.
Sincerely
Laser Haas
All this because Mr. Rattner made an unqualified statement. How, in light of the vast evidence above and profuse upon the web; can anyone with a straight face state this?
I don't think there's anything Bain Capital did
that they need to be embarrassed about."