Want the scoop on hot races around the country? Get the digest emailed to you each weekday morning.
Sign up here.
9:16 AM PT: MA-Sen: This ridiculous story exploded on to the Twitters late on Monday:
Senator Scott Brown said he will accept a debate at the Edward M. Kennedy Institute but only on the condition that Vicki Kennedy stay neutral in the election and that MSNBC not be included as a broadcast partner.
Yep, that's right—only if Ted Kennedy's widow keeps her mouth shut! Much hashtag goodness to be found at
#scottbrowndebatedemands.
9:26 AM PT: AZ-08/AZ-02: Well, that was quick. Sam Stone, the communications director for Martha McSally who just a day earlier was busted for handing a business card to a Ron Barber campaign aide containing hand-scrawled advice on how to beat McSally's fellow Republican, Jesse Kelly, in the special election, is now out of a job. Obviously the optics of having a top staffer trying to help the other side weren't particularly good for McSally, who is now hoping to beat Barber in November.
9:31 AM PT: FL-Sen: It looks like FreedomWorks is buying into Connie Mack's claim that the GOP must rally around him stat, primary be damned, if they're to have any hope of beating Dem Sen. Bill Nelson. That gambit might work, but it also might further alienate conservatives who are inclined to mistrust Mack—we'll have to see. But FreedomWorks is forging ahead and endorsing Mack. It's not clear whether they'll actually spend money here, though; indeed, the Tampa Bay Times suggests kinda of not really:
In addition to signaling its preference, FreedomWorks provides candidates with yard signs, door hangers and other get out the vote materials. Candidates also get put into its national phone banking system. People from Ohio, for example, could be making calls on Mack's behalf.
I think that last line may be a slight back-handed dig at where Mack's support is coming from.
10:06 AM PT: California: While California's vote count from its primary (two weeks ago!) is still dragging on, at least Secretary of State Debra Bowen has provided a special page for keeping track of "close" contents. The SoS's definition of "close" is actually a bit broad—any contest where "there is less than a two percent difference between second and third place"—because some of the races on their list have already been decided, like CA-52.
But there are a few others where no second-place finisher has been called as yet, including in CA-02. (Other "close" affairs include Prop 29, CA-08, CA-21, CA-38, and about ten legislative races.) I mention CA-02 specifically because Democrat Norman Solomon, currently in third, sent out a press release on Monday arguing that he'd make up the gap between himself and Republican Dan Roberts (who is in second) as the remaining votes get counted. But jeffmd ran the numbers himself, and we've reached a different conclusion:
CA-02 is composed of six counties, three of which are fully reported per the Norman Solomon campaign (Del Norte, Mendocino, and Trinity). Solomon further claims there are 17,200 ballots outstanding in the remaining three (6,500 Humboldt; 8,700 Sonoma; 2,000 Marin). At this point, Solomon trails Dan Roberts by 1,241 votes (Democrat Jared Huffman is solidly in the first slot).
Solomon further claims that late-arriving absentees (vote-by-mail ballots, or "VBMs") should look like votes cast on Election Day ("precinct votes"). Accepting this claim for the sake of argument, the detail of VBMs and precinct votes provided by Humboldt and Marin can be used to extrapolate how these late-arriving VBMs should look:
• In Humboldt, Roberts got 15.91% of the precinct vote to Solomon's 14.40%. Applying this to the 6,500 outstanding, this would add 98 votes to Roberts' lead, not cut into it.
• In Marin, Solomon got 18.26% of the precinct vote to Roberts' 11.64%. Applying this to the 2,000 outstanding, this would cut 132 votes into Roberts' lead.
Together, even accepting Solomon's reasoning, Roberts would still lead by 1,207 votes after Humboldt and Marin are added. This leaves Sonoma. Making up a 1,200 vote difference is a tall order by itself—head to head against Roberts, Solomon has received 51.3% of the two-person vote counted in Sonoma thus far. To make up the 1,207 vote difference, Solomon would need 56.94% of the two-person vote... assuming all 8,700 votes were cast between Solomon and Roberts. This is, of course, impossible: Almost 70% of the votes counted in Sonoma thus far were cast for other candidates.
Even conservatively assuming (that is, favorably to Solomon) that only 60% of the remaining votes were cast for the rest of the field (i.e., all candidates that aren't Solomon and Roberts), that would only leave about 3,500 votes between Solomon and Roberts, meaning Solomon would now need to get 67.3% of those 3,500 votes. When compared to the 51.3% that he has been getting, the 67.3% seems very unlikely. While precinct votes were more favorable to Solomon, it's very unlikely that they will be that much more favorable. (Using a more realistic 65% figure for votes cast for the field, Solomon's required two-person share increases to 69.8%; using the actual share received by the field—69.96%—Solomon's required two-person share increases further to 73.1%.) Even in Marin, Solomon's share of the two-person vote only increased from 48% among VBMs to 61% among precinct votes.
Fundamentally, the main problem for Solomon is as follows: Yes, there are lots of votes outstanding, but the other candidates (Huffman, Adams, Lawson, et al.), will suck up a big chunk of them (70.8% of them to date district-wide; 71.5% of them in the three counties of interest). There isn't an obvious reason to believe that that will change any more than a few percent: There was almost no change in Humboldt, and in Marin, 74% of VBMs were cast for the field compared to 70% of precinct votes. A 1,200-vote lead would be somewhat fragile given 17,000+ outstanding, but the 17,000 figure is a canard—60%+ of them will be going to candidates other than Solomon and Roberts. When the number of relevant votes outstanding is less than 7,000, Roberts' 1,200 vote lead looks much more solid.
10:34 AM PT: HI-02: Former Honolulu mayor Mufi Hannemann is predictably pushing back against a pair of polls conducted on behalf of Honolulu Civil Beat which showed the HI-02 Democratic primary a tossup between himself and Honolulu City Council member Tulsi Gabbard. Hannemann's own poll, from QMark Research, has him up 45-27... but even those numbers are not particularly good news for him, because it shows a considerable tightening from his earlier QMark results. In August of last year, Hannemann led 66-11, and in February of this year, that had been cut to 57-15. Those are some bad trendlines, and they may well accelerate with the primary just two months away. Gabbard still has a lot of work cut out for her, but an upset doesn't look impossible anymore. Like they say about baseball, this is why they play the games!
11:22 AM PT: AZ-08: Congratulations to Democrat Ron Barber, who was just sworn in as the newest member of the 112th Congress! Barber, of course, won a special election last week to replace ex-Rep. Gabby Giffords, who resigned earlier this year to focus on recovering from the injuries she suffered in the infamous 2011 shooting at a public event in Tucson.
11:34 AM PT: Polltopia: We're suggesting a vote for Connecticut this week in PPP's "where should we poll" poll, to check on those surprising Quinnipiac numbers we recently saw out of the Nutmeg State.
11:50 AM PT: NE-Sen: I wouldn't be holding my breath waiting for Bob Kerrey to release a dueling internal: Republican Deb Fischer's new poll, from Public Opinion Strategies, puts her up 58-33 over the Democratic ex-senator. What I would love to see is the polling conducted earlier this year which convinced Kerrey he had a path to victory.
12:03 PM PT: IN-Gov/WATN?: I wasn't quite sure what to file this under: Mitch Daniels, though term-limited and therefore not seeking re-election, is still Indiana's sitting governor, but what he does next with his life doesn't really affect this year's race. At the same time, it's rather unusual to see a current office-holder make plans for the future with half a year still left on his term. But there you have it: Purdue University (based in West Lafayette, IN) is reportedly slated to make Daniels its next president.
It's a somewhat remarkable turn of events for a guy who weighed a presidential bid last year and was supposedly on Mitt Romney's VP short-list. Now, instead, he's going to be out of politics. Apparently, Daniels won't quit his term early (even though Purdue's current president is stepping down soon), but since he'll want to avoid bad p.r. for his new employer, he won't be able to function as much of a partisan attack-dog this fall. That's no small thing, given the competitive races on the docket in Indiana this year.
12:13 PM PT (David Jarman): WA-Gov: Two new polls, from PPP and Elway, show a razor-thin lead for Republican Rob McKenna in the Washington governor's race. Taking these and other recent polls into consideration (most of which have have shown movement in Inslee's direction), Daily Kos Elections is upgrading WA-Gov from Lean Republican to Tossup. PPP's sample also has some impressive numbers in Washington for legalizing same-sex marriage and marijuana, both of which will be on November's ballot. Click through for our full analysis.
12:35 PM PT: AZ-Sen: Yowza. A new PPP poll taken for Project New America (formerly known as Project New West) shows remarkably tight numbers in both the open-seat Senate race and he presidential contest. GOP Rep. Jeff Flake is up just 43-41 over Democrat Richard Carmona, a huge shift from PPP's last survey (PDF) which had Flake leading 48-35. Similarly, Romney's edge is just 49-46; it was 50-43 in May (PDF). So what happened? Well, the sample got a bit bluer, but not by that much—it was R+15 last time, and now it's R+12. If there's really been a big shift in the Democratic direction here, I'd like to see confirmation from some further polling first.
12:38 PM PT: CA-02: An update from Jeff:
I don't want to blame Debra Bowen (I should know better not to rely on her), but as Ben Malley astutely pointed out, neither Mendocino nor Trinity's final results got included on the SoS's website. With Mendocino's final results, we're talking a 513-vote lead for Roberts. This improves the picture for Solomon, since a 500-vote deficit is much easier to overcome than a 1,200-vote one.
One other aspect should have been included in the earlier analysis—write-ins and over/under votes. There's no solid justification for why write-ins and over/under votes would happen at a different frequency in late-arriving VBMs; we've been seeing upwards of a 6% undervote on the congressional race of all ballots cast. Thus, of the estimated 17,200 ballots left, even fewer than initially estimated will factor into the race. There could be some factor that skews the numbers in Solomon's favor across the board that can propel him past Roberts...but that's a conjecture at best.
Overall, I'm no longer as dismissive of Solomon's chances as I was earlier—if all 8,700 Sonoma County ballots were cast between Roberts and Solomon, Solomon would need about 53% of them. With votes for the field, over/undervotes, and write-ins excluded, Solomon still needs about 58-60% of the two-person vote to pull this out. We learned in 2010 (from the Attorney General election that Kamala Harris won) that VBMs can swing wildly, so I'm also not nearly as confident as the Solomon campaign seems.
12:53 PM PT: MT-Sen: Rasmussen Reports: Jon Tester (D-inc): 47 (43), Denny Rehberg (R): 49 (53).
1:58 PM PT: MA-Sen: And like that, Scott Brown's taken his ball and gone home. I guess the Kennedy Center couldn't make that whole McRib thing happen.
2:15 PM PT (David Jarman): Dark money: Recently I wrote about how American Action Network (a 501(c)(4) "social welfare" group, which means that it can cloak its contributors) was moving away from advertising to just being a money conduit to Republican Super PACs; now I'm wondering if their increased interest in lying low may mean they've gotten some advance notice that the Dems are finally starting to crack the whip on abuse of 501(c)(4) status. The Obama camp just filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission demanding that Crossroads GPS, another 501(c)(4) that has also been brazen in crossing over into political advocacy, disclose the names of its donors. (Of course, it's not likely that the FEC process will resolve this before the election -- and it's likely to find its way into the federal courts after that -- by which time Crossroads' damage will have already been done.)
501(c)(4)s, like PACs, are also supposed to avoid coordination with actual campaigns, but that's always been a pretty toothless rule. Salon did some good digging and found how transparent the nexus is, in the case of the North Dakota Senate race: Crossroads GPS, which has spent $140K on ads in that race, uses the same Republican 'communications consulting' firm, Black Rock Communications, as the Rick Berg campaign. With only three principals at Black Rock (one of whom, Carl Forti, is also Crossroads' politicla director), it's hard to imagine how they keep any firewalls in place between their Berg work and Crossroads work.
2:29 PM PT: NY-25: Good news: Dem Rep. Louise Slaughter returned to work in Washington, DC, for the first time since she broke her left leg in April, a serious injury which still has her using a motorized scooter. Slaughter, 82, faces a serious re-election challenge from Monroe County Executive Maggie Brooks.
2:35 PM PT: NRCC/DCCC: The NRCC just reserved another $5.7 million in airtime in eight different media markets (covering seven notable races), bringing their total reservations to $23.9 million. That compares to $46.1 million for the DCCC. Helpfully, Aaron Blake has spreadsheets detailing exactly where and how much these reservations are for, for both parties. Relatedly, the D-Trip outraised its Republican counterpart in the month of May, $6.7 million to $6 million. The NRCC still has more cash-on-hand, though: $33.8 mil to $27.5 mil.
2:51 PM PT: WI-Sen: And of course Eric Hovde's doubled down on his bizarre insistence that the press spends too much time covering "sob stories" about people who can't get food stamps. The Hotline pressed the Wisconsin Republican on his views; Hovde not only thinks that poor Americans are being "taken care of," but also repeats his claim that they're just receiving too much damn attention:
In a Monday afternoon interview with Hotline On Call, Hovde defended his comments, saying there is a dearth of stories on food stamp fraud and fraud in the Medicare/Medicaid system. "Poverty in America is vastly different than poverty in most of the world," Hovde added. "And we have multiple safety nets and multiple programs that are taking care of people, and yet that is where the press almost always invariably goes."
3:04 PM PT: IL-12: It's a little hard to know exactly where things stand with the process to select a replacement for Brad Harriman because local Democrats are refusing to say who exactly has submitted applications to the committee which is responsible for choosing a new candidate. That's frankly a very strange decision, so all we've got are announcements from hopefuls themselves. And here's a new one: State Rep. John Bradley, who previously said he was "intrigued" by the prospect of running, went ahead and tossed his name into the hopper before last Friday's deadline. He joins Retired Maj. Gen. William Enyart in the "definitely under consideration" pile. One other possibility (though we don't know if he's actually applied) is former Rep. David Phelps, a conservative Democrat who was a redistricting victim a decade ago, losing to GOP Rep. John Shimkus.
In any event, ten total prospects are in the mix, and public interviews will be conducted this Saturday in the town of Chester. One of the panel's co-chairs says she expects a vote on a replacement to take place that day, after the interviews are finished.
3:28 PM PT: HI-Sen: Who knew that having your own Oprah Winfrey-style cable station could be so cheap? I'm sure by now you've heard that Republican Senate candidate Linda Lingle has created her own TV network (LL2012! channel 110 on your Oceanic Time Warner dial!) to promote her candidacy round-the-clock among television viewers too stupid to figure out what's going on on the other 999 channels. And the price, it turns out, is just $5,000 a week. As MAD Magazine would say, cheap!
Thanks to some diligent investigative work, we've also gotten our hands on a partial prime-time programming schedule for LL2012 this week:
6:00pm: Maui City Council zoning subcommittee meeting, May 4, 1982 (Linda Lingle, chair)
7:00pm: Linda's World! visits Hawaii's wettest rainforests
7:30pm: Book Talk: "What Being a Jewish Republican Means to Me," by Linda Lingle
8:00pm: Law & Order: Special Victims Unit
9:00pm: 1998 gubernatorial debate between Linda Lingle and Ben Cayetano [closed captioned]
9:30pm: Video from that cousin's wedding that Linda really didn't want to go to but felt she had to go to because, oy gevalt, you don't want to upset your mother like that, do you?
10:00pm: Law & Order: Special Victims Unit
3:39 PM PT: NY-06: Let's just say that Democrat Rory Lancman's latest mailer (available at the link) is not the kind of thing a campaign that's leading in the polls would send out.
3:48 PM PT: MO-Sen: Dem Sen. Claire McCaskill just became the latest candidate running in a swing state to throw down a big sum on fall TV advertising, before all the outside groups and presidential campaigns buy up all the available airtime. McCaskill's spending $3 million for "statewide broadcast television for the final weeks" of the election. She has $6 mil in the bank, so she can easily afford this, especially since buying time early gets you lower rates.
4:23 PM PT: MI-Sen: Desperate to change the conversation to, well, just about anything else, Republican ex-Rep. Pete Hoekstra has a new radio ad in which he excoriates leakers of classified information as "traitors." Says Hoeksta: "As a former chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, I know a thing or two about keeping our country safe." And as former Intelligence chair, Hoesktra himself had loose lips about security issues and repeatedly got himself into trouble by sharing information he wasn't permitted to share. Michigan Democrats whipped up a quickie micro-site called "Pete 'Leak-a-Lot' Hoekstra," calling attention to, among other things, the fact that Hoekstra tweeted about his movements on a trip to Iraq, revealing his location and military practices "in real time."
5:29 PM PT (James L): AZ-Sen: A new Super PAC called "Secure Arizona Now" is out with a new ad that goes for Republican Jeff Flake's jugular. First, it leads off with footage of Jeff Flake admitting that he "lied" when he pledged to only serve three terms in the House, then poses the ominous question: "What else is Jeff Flake dishonest about?" The ad alleges that Flake flip-flopped on his initial support for the Keystone XL pipeline, ultimately "siding with Obama" and Nancy Pelosi. Size of the buy, though? A miniscule $8K, which apparently buys only 30 rotations on Fox News – in other words, this is yet another glorified video press release. And who's behind this Super PAC, anyway? Its treasurer is Kansas City, Missouri attorney James C. Thomas III, a Republican who served on Gov. Jay Nixon's legislative redistricting panel and is also a dedicated Axis & Allies enthusiast.
5:52 PM PT (James L): ND-Sen: The DSCC is out with their second ad of the cycle against GOP Rep. Rick Berg. According to Roll Call, it's an $86K buy spread over two weeks. The visually interesting ad attacks Berg on the usual themes (e.g. tax cuts for millionaires and job-outsourcing corporations, ending Medicare as we know it, etc.) using the interface of Words With Friends (a Scrabble-like word game).
5:59 PM PT (James L): NY-06: EMILY's List's direct mail campaign on behalf of Assemblywoman Grace Meng (D) continues with another $15,000 expenditure, bringing their total-to-date investment in this race to $87K.
6:10 PM PT (James L): OK-01: I have no idea why various medical PACs are lining up to support GOP Rep. John Sullivan in his primary bid, but lining up they are. First it was the ophthalmologists, a PAC whose actions I have long loathed, and now the American Society of Anesthesiologists is getting in on the fun with a $19K radio ad buy on Sullivan's behalf. Not to be outdone, the Ophthalmologists doubled down with an $18K buy on... someone or something called "Other Fella". (Something tells me the eye docs will be filing an amendment for this one soon.) Sullivan, it should be noted, is not a former ophthalmologist or anesthesiologist or medical professional of any kind – his sole career experience prior to entering politics, according to Wikipedia, was a brief stint as a realtor wherein he sealed the deal on the sale of six homes.
6:31 PM PT (James L): OH-Sen: Outside money continues to fall like rain in Ohio. First, the AFL-CIO is dropping $100K on online ads appearing on the homepages and sports pages of the Cleveland Plain Dealer and Akron Beacon Journal – the ads parody the visuals of LeBron James' "Witness" ad, inviting online readers to "Witness the Mandel Investigation", referring to $105K in possibly illegal donations that the Mandel campaign received from employees of the Suarez Corporation. Next, the SEIU has upped their ad buy against Mandel by just over $200K, bringing their total tab in this race to $754K. (Presumably, this money is going to an extension of this ad buy, which targets Mandel on Social Security and Medicare, but that's not clear.) And finally, FreedomWorks is dishing out $49K on door hangers, yard signs, bumper stickers, and the like, on Mandel's behalf.
6:36 PM PT (James L): UT-Sen: The National Federation of Independent Business is spending $51K on "political advertising" on behalf of GOP Sen. Orrin Hatch. But whether that means print, radio, TV, or billboards outside of SLC-area Home Depots, we don't know.