Dr. Steven Chu is stepping down as Secretary of Energy. His legacy, if you're sane: a huge rethink of the Department of Energy from a nuclear proponent to a renewable energy market-maker: creating ARPA-E for advanced research into energy and the SunShot Initiative for solar power, and doling out stimulus funds. His legacy, if you're an insane Republican making much ado about nothing: Solyndrasolyndrasolyndrasolyndrakeeprepeatingthewordandmaybeitwillmeansomething.
President Obama's statement, in part:
Steve brought to the Energy Department a unique understanding of both the urgent challenge presented by climate change and the tremendous opportunity that clean energy represents for our economy.
Just how well did Chu understand the urgent challenge presented by climate change? His own,
substantially lengthier statement included this:
I want to conclude by making a few observations about the importance of the Department of Energy missions to our economic prosperity, dependency on foreign oil and climate change.
The United States spent roughly $430 billion dollars on foreign oil in 2012. This is a direct wealth transfer out of our country. Many billions more are spent to keep oil shipping lanes open and oil geo-politics add considerable additional burdens. Although our oil imports are projected to fall to a 25 year low next year, we still pay a heavy economic, national security and human cost for our oil addiction.
The average temperature of our planet is rising, with majority of the temperature increase occurring in the last thirty years. During the three decades from 1980 to 2011, the number of violent storms, floods, droughts, heat waves, wildfires, as tabulated by the reinsurance company Munich Re, has increased more than three-fold. They also estimate that the financial losses follow a trend line that has gone from $40 billion to $170 billion dollars per year. Most of those losses were not insured, and the country suffering the largest losses by far is the United States. As the President said in his recent Inaugural Address, “some may still deny the overwhelming judgment of science, but none can avoid the devastating impact of raging fires, and crippling drought, and more powerful storms.”
The overwhelming scientific consensus is that human activity has had a significant and likely dominant role in climate change. There is also increasingly compelling evidence that the weather changes we have witnessed during this thirty year time period are due to climate change.
Virtually all of the other OECD countries, and most developing countries including China, India, Mexico, and Brazil have accepted the judgment of climate scientists.
Many countries, but most notably China, realize that the development of clean energy technologies presents an incredible economic opportunity in an emerging world market. China now exceeds the U.S. in internal deployment of clean energy and in government investments to further develop the technologies.
While we cannot accurately predict the course of climate change in the coming decades, the risks we run if we don’t change our course are enormous. Prudent risk management does not equate uncertainty with inaction.
Our ability to find and extract fossil fuels continues to improve, and economically recoverable reservoirs around the world are likely to keep pace with the rising demand for decades. As the saying goes, the Stone Age did not end because we ran out of stones; we transitioned to better solutions.
The same opportunity lies before us with energy efficiency and clean energy. The cost of renewable energy is rapidly becoming competitive with other sources of energy, and the Department has played a significant role in accelerating the transition to affordable, accessible and sustainable energy.
This extraordinarily intelligent man grasps what many in Washington may not yet have internalized:
climate change is not an environmental problem to be solved by environmentalists. It's already a big economic issue poised to become much, much larger. It presents huge challenges for the economy of the United States and the world. And we can transform our world. We can innovate past the Stone Age.
And Chu also recognizes that climate is as much a moral issue as an economic one: "Ultimately we have a moral responsibility to the most innocent victims of adverse climate change. Those who will suffer the most are the people who are the most innocent: the world’s poorest citizens and those yet to be born."
When he was first nominated, many worried that he would be too friendly toward nuclear power at the expense of renewables. Under his leadership, the Department of Energy has greenlighted one nuclear power plant. It's also laid the foundation for a vast renewable market and led the way on research that we may not know about for decades. I thank him for his leadership. And I hope that those yet to be born will also have reason to thank him.