It is hard to believe that anyone in main stream would be more inane and brown nosing than "Faux News". But Forbes Harry Binswanger (whom Taibbi says could be "Harry Kingbanger" or "Harry Wandwanker") sucks up to Goldman Sachs with his Forbes OpEd article absurdly titled "Give Back? Yes, It's Time for the 99% to Give Back to the 1%". In that story that also (believe it or not) by Wanger-banter-banger defends Ayn Rand, states the following ridiculous remarks;
Imagine the effect on our culture, particularly on the young, if the kind of fame and adulation bathing Lady Gaga attached to the more notable achievements of say, Warren Buffett. Or if the moral praise showered on Mother Teresa went to someone like Lloyd Blankfein, who, in guiding Goldman Sachs toward billions in profits, has done infinitely more for mankind. (Since profit is the market value of the product minus the market value of factors used, profit represents the value created.)
Instead, we live in a culture where Goldman Sachs is smeared as “a great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity.” That’s for the sin of successful investing, channeling savings to their most productive uses, instead of wasting them on government boondoggles like Solyndra and bridges to nowhere.
Harvey Swingfanger didn't link to Matt 's "vampire squid"; but it irked Taibbi enough that he responded in kind. Thank G-d Rolling Stone (who had put on its September 2012 cover Taibbi's article "
Greed and Debt: The True Story About Mitt Romney and Bain Capital") this time did not find it necessary to edit out Matt Taibbi's mention of yours truly eToys case as one of the cases to refute the premise that Goldman Sachs is better than Mother Teresa.
More Below the Fold....
Goldman Sachs & Bain Capital Conspired to Destroy eToys
To sum up the issues at hand germane to this D writer, Goldman Sachs and Bain Capital utilize the same law firm in Delaware of Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnel ("MNAT"). That law firm lied to the Delaware bankruptcy court and confessed it did so about Goldman Sachs. Then MNAT - while benefiting from Perjury acts - handpicked a cohort in crime (Paul Traub) to be the one to prosecute Goldman Sachs in the New York Supreme Court case of eToys (renamed ebc1 when Bain Capital stole the eToys.com domain names) versus Goldman Sachs (case number 601805/2002).
CAN Frank Nitti be allowed to pick a friend to prosecute Al Capone?
Of course not!
Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi has yet to get into this issue; but it is all going to come out real soon. Because Mitt Romney WAS the CEO of Bain Capital in 2001, when the crimes began - and that IS News! Yours truly alleges (and can give good proof) that the one of the reasons Romney wants to be "retroactively" resigned from August 2001 - back to February 11, 1999 - is to dodge his culpability for organized crimes. The picture to the right is by Rmuse from PoliticusUSA.com who wrote many good stories about Racketeering Romney. The chart above shows you that there's no 6-degrees of separation between the culprits.
Can Al Capone "retroactively"
dodge Tax Evasion by simply giving back some now?
Of course not!
Matt Taibbi's Spank of Forbes Wanker on Goldman Sachs eToys Scams
.
So Harry Binswanger suggest that the 99% owes the 1% even more (than the 1% steals/deals already). So much so that Taibbi says Binswanger actually states that anyone getting over $1 million a year should never pay any tax. For Real!
To the notion that Goldman Sachs is good for the world (and better than Mother Teresa) Rolling Stone's Matt Taibbi has much evidence to the contrary to say in his Blog article titled; "Forbes Calls Goldman CEO Holier Than Mother Teresa". What excites yours truly is that Taibbi went out of his way to speak out about our eToys case and how Goldman Sachs is not a nice guy (and was classy about it all in a way I'll tell you later). This is what Matt Taibbi said about eToys;
"Just for yuks, let's fill Binswanger in on some of the ways Goldman has made its money over the years. This is just the stuff they've been caught for, by the way.
• Way back in 1999, several eras of corruption ago, Goldman serially engaged in manipulation of the IPO markets, including illegal tactics like "spinning" and "laddering," where insiders and top bank clients would be allowed to buy shares in new companies at severely discounted prices, sometimes in return for investment banking business or for promises that those insiders would jump back into the bidding later to jack up the price artificially. In a famous case involving eToys, Goldman paid a $7.5 million settlement for allowing insiders to buy shares at $20, far below the $75 shares the company traded on opening day. The secret discounts might have cost the company hundreds of millions of dollars. The firm went bankrupt in short order, by the way".
Goldman Sachs and Bain Capital are in BIG Trouble
!
.
Reuters new story that Taibbi links to in his remarks "a famous case involving eToys" - has an errant title that states everything is now over.
We regret to inform Reuters/Westlaw reporter Tom Hals got it wrong with his title of the story that; "Goldman Sachs finally ends litigation over 1999 eToys IPO"
It ain't over till Laser Haas quits!
Once again, I'm compelled to go back to the issues at hand. The Delaware Bankruptcy Court already punished Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnel ("MNAT") - who is the law firm for Goldman Sachs in Delaware.
It is a matter of court docket record - archived - that MNAT lied about its connections to Mattel, GECC, Bain Capital and Goldman Sachs. Then MNAT actually was forced to CONFESS it's bad faith in 2005; because MNAT got "caught".
At that time the Delaware Bankruptcy Court punished MNAT and addressed the fact that MNAT should be disqualified (removed from the case); but then the judge said the case is now over and it would not be practical to remove MNAT now. You can see the Delaware Bankruptcy Court Opinion at the Court's website (and - HERE).
That was in 2005 and here we are 8 years later -the case is still going strong.
What Taibbi should be addressing (and hasn't yet) is that, in essence, Goldman Sachs sued Goldman Sachs and Goldman Sachs decided to "settle" with Goldman Sachs to give back $7 million of the hundreds of millions it stole from eToys a decade ago. Plus, some of that $7 million is going to Goldman Sachs law firm.
It is all so ILLEGALLY absurd!
Goldman Sachs Law Firm Partner Was a U. S. Attorney For 7 Years
.
Now this is the REAL BIG story. It is Mitt Romney's ultimate "retroactive" secret. If Matt Taibbi would simply be allowed to point out this fact, by just asking the question of "How is it that Goldman Sachs and Bain Capital were not investigated by the Delaware United States Attorney Colm Connolly; who worked for the MNAT law firm that represents Goldman Sachs and Bain Capital"?
Then this whole case would be over!
Here's the proof from the Department of Justice Office of Legal Policy permanent ARCHIVED website; it is the
resume of Colm Connolly that shows he was an Assistant United States Attorney until 1999. At that time he then became a partner of MNAT. Then in August 2001 Colm Connolly was promoted out of MNAT to the post of United States Attorney of Delaware.
Where Colm Connolly then refused to investigate his former partners & clients!
And that's not the rest of the story. When I reported this to the Public Corruption Task Force in Los Angeles on December 7, 2007, when the answer was due 12 weeks later, the Department of Justice Public Corruption Task Force was SHUT DOWN and career federal prosecutors were purportedly THREATENED to keep their mouths shut or ELSE!
See the L.A. Times story "Shake-up roils federal prosecutors"!
CONCLUSION
It is hard to believe that so much can go on in a few cases and yet no one is being arrested, indicted and prosecuted. But it is much harder to comprehend that the Department of Justice personnel in the ranks can snow their bosses so much.
For surely it must be that Eric Holder has No Idea!
Be that as it may, Goldman Sachs can not be permitted to settle several hundred millions of dollars in fraud for just $7 million. It is ABSURD!
What is even much more bogus is that a United States Attorney was allowed to bury such massive frauds and CONFESSED acts of Perjury (more than 33) - and still let the White Collar Pirates keep the keys to the vaults they are fleecing. Even the Judge, in here OPINION of October 4, 2005 (on page 16) stated that it would be wrong to punish plaintiff and reward conflicted attorneys;
but that's exactly what is happening in eToys case!
Goldman Sachs is attempting to settle how much it stole from eToys and give back a few million out of the hundreds of millions Goldman Sachs stole. The same attorneys who are doing this fraud just so happen to also work for Mitt Romney's Bain Capital. MNAT represents Bain Capital in the $83 million Kay Bee Toys fraud that Michael Glazer paid Bain Capital when he paid himself $18 million; before filing bankruptcy of Kay Bee.
And Paul Traub asked to be the Prosecutor of Glazer and Bain.
If ANYONE other than yours truly reports the fact, asks the questions or says that Bain Capital stole/sold eToys federal bankruptcy estate goods to Bain Capital/ Kay Bee then Toys R Us (which is owned by Bain Capital) will have to give back the stolen property of eToys.
Obviously, if yours truly were sitting in his eToys chair that Barry Gold is now sitting in, Goldman Sachs and Bain Capital could never get away with their fraud. That is why yours truly was thrown out after I turned down the $850,000 bribe offer and chance to become Mitt Romney's partner. Almost all my friends and family says I;m stupid for doing so.
What do you think?
All we can do is hope and pray that somebody (and I would love for it to be Taibbi) will point out all these issues. Evil Robber Barons want to SEAL all this stuff from public view. As is reported by the New York Times March 2013 article "Rigging the I.P.O. Game" - the entire case of eToys v Goldman Sachs is under SEAL. One reason the crooks put that under SEAL is due to the fact yours truly kept digging and finding more frauds. Including the fact that;
MNAT Destroyed eToys Books & Records (HERE).
That's Obstruction of Justice - via Perjury - to Destroy Evidence!
N'est-ce pas!
PLEASE BE ADVISED - THINGS JUST CHANGED
Having had a discussion with some venerates of the realm. Including those who do and do not believe in my postings, I'm taking advice from experts upon high. Including persons who are attorneys at law that care about what is going on in our cases; and people who are experts with vast experience.
Some people want yours truly banned and have been able to BAIT me into arguments that are really an exercise in futility. It is a fact that those of us in eToys who have been fighting the case for a decade are victims of organized crime. Our adversaries are Goldman Sachs, Bain Capital and autocrats of the most heinous kind.
If you are decent and care about the suffering of others, then it should be easy for you to put yourself in my shoes and think about the following;
How would you feel, if you had your career destroyed, your life savings stolen and your family, friends and others harmed by White Collar organized criminals?
To then come to a place where fellow Progressives should be sympathetic to your plight. But - INSTEAD - you have to endure assaults (usually be the same persons over and over again) calling you a nut, liar and CT!
NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO DO THAT WITHOUT A FACTUAL BASIS
What our conundrum is, no matter how strong the evidence may be, is that it is absolutely stupid to tell your own story; especially when your opponents are Goldman Sachs and Bain Capital. People inherently turn a deaf ear. Someone else should be telling this tale - IT IS a Prize capable story. But they can't. Matt Taibbi is a reporter. He actually doesn't work for Rolling Stone (as the front desk keeps telling me every time I call). Taibbi doesn't control the presses - the Editors DO!
Somewhere there also seems to be an unwritten by-law that victims shouldn't tell their tale unless your are an attorney at law who graduated summa cum laude, have a PHD in English/Literature - and look like Rock Hudson.
Yours truly didn't graduate from high school, has taken mock BAR exams (failing miserably) - and I'm overweight and ugly. If the mobsters would have gone by those unwritten By-Laws, then maybe all of U.S. could have been spared this debacle.
But they didn't. The pirates tried to bribe me - and silly Laser turned it down.
Regardless of your like or disdain of me, I'm staying in this battle. Why I engage in debate with people who argue in what I consider a disingenuous manner, is due to the fact that I actually give a damn about providing proof to the contrary of their argument. I'm now made well aware that such is a fools folly. If a person enters MY Diary and doesn't speak in what I consider a legitimate fashion - instead of arguing with them - I'm simply going to IGNORE them.
It is a simple FACT that 2 law firms have admitted to Lying Under Oath. They are MNAT and Paul Traub. Martha Stewart went to jail for 6 months. Paul Traub, who was partners with Ponzi Schemer Tom Petters - that stole Polaroid by Ponzi Scheme monies - wound up with Polaroid for FREE. The Federal Receiver of Petters is the one who said Paul Traub was "controller" of Tom Petters Ponzi.
Those who call me names - won't even admit the law firms LIED under Oath.
Thus, the game is changed. I'm taking the advice of those who have vast more experience in dealing with naysays. Though I'm hurt that one I care about much, seems to think I'm mean; the fact of the matter is - I'm a real nice guy - and I care about this DK realm. So here are the new rules of my D.
1. You don't like Laser Haas - TOUGH - I don't care.
2. For whatever reasons you don't believe what I have to say - I DON"T CARE.
3. If you are not asking what I believe to be a legitimate question;
I'm not going to answer you - it's just that simple.
Finally, instead of explaining the whole story or a large amount of it, my D's from now on will try to compete with Twitter. To be as short as humanly possible. One venerate of this realm told me that he would lose juries if he put out a chart with 20 connections on it. That person (who originally took issue with my contentions) now wants to help me persuade good people here to pay attention; but his eyes roll over when he sees my charts/ pics etc.
Therefore, I'm going to detail the crimes, doing so 1 by 1 per Diary - with new charts and graphs to do so. It will be much harder for bad faith parties to find fault with a point of fact D.
Yours truly now has such good faith assistance that is so well persuasive- another venerate of the realm is providing me with a gratis copy of MS Office and Photo Shop software - so that I can more readily provide better visual details for everyone's view.
It is about to get real ladies and gentlemen. Romney's Bain Capital owns Clear Channel Communications, with 800 stations, over 100 million listeners and shows like Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck and more. Once I file against Romney himself, they are going to let loose the legions upon me. If you think the naysay is bad now - just wait a few weeks. My birthday is October 31 (yes THAT explains it all); before my b-day comes, I'm going to file the biggie.
Clear Channel was founded by Red McCombs - who also owns Black Water
I'm messing with a guy who has access to a Mercenary Army.
Thus I need not bog myself down in banter futile with those hell bent to find fault!
Our eToys case is a travesty of manifest injustice extraordinary and must be corrected - post haste! It is a morale imperative
1
PLEASE Remember - Yours Truly is a Victim of Organized Crime!
Meanwhile, on a good note - Trayvan's Mother's Petition is above 400,000
And many other similar battles continue
Tomorrow - we are going to discuss lying under oath by John Gellene
Eat What You Kill
I am going to reiterate a compliment given to me by someone all of you know. At first glance this legal professional didn't believe in me either. Since then the person has come around. (Said I could have persuaded the person sooner, had I been a better story teller; but that is why attorneys who represent themselves have a fool for a client - you are TOO involved).
Anyway that person said "congrats, you've made a difference. No matter who gets credit for what, you said all along that Romney was lying about his tenure at Bain Capital; and you were vindicated on that. You also wanted to keep Bain Capital in the news - and in the news Bain Capital remains till this very day. It is also a fact that you didn't want Willard to become President of the United States and;
Romney didn't make it
N'est-ce pas!
Laser has the truth -Molon Labe!
|