They must notify you that you are on the list. They must provide justification for list placement. They must have a working process to challenge placement on the No Fly List.
Court opinion PDF
The FBI compiles the list through a related program and releases the list to the Transportation Security Administration.
Of course the FBI would NEVER abuse their trust for political reasons.
You know like use it as punishment in order to get subjects to talk.
People who are placed on the government's no-fly list are denied their constitutional right to due process, because the government's procedures to challenge inclusion on the secretive roster are "wholly ineffective," a federal judge ruled.
In a 65-page opinion issued Tuesday, U.S. District Judge Anna Brown ordered the government to come up with a new way for the 13 plaintiffs to contest their inclusion on the list that prohibits them from flying in or through U.S. airspace. The government must provide notice to the plaintiffs that they are on the roster and give the reasons for their inclusion, Brown wrote. She also ordered that the government allow the plaintiffs to submit evidence to refute the government's suspicions.
No-fly list ruling
Read the decision by the U.S. District Court in the case of the federal no-fly list.
The decision marks a big win for the plaintiffs, all U.S. citizens or permanent residents, and the American Civil Liberties Union, which argued the case on their behalf. The plaintiffs have all been denied boarding due to their placement on the list, they argue, despite never having been charged with a terrorism-related offense.