For every syllable of hate thrown.
For every threat.
For all the fear induced.
For every aggression
For each and every abuse
For every hurt.
For every death.
This is not a question of freedom of speech, it is one of terrorism.
Nobody has a right to speak to me one on one.
“The court recognized our First Amendment rights, and now I’ll have a chance to speak to people one-on-one,” said Eleanor McCullen, the lead petitioner in the case.
Nobody has the right to molest me verbally and physically.
Nobody has the right to menace me.
Nobody has the right to harm me.
Nobody has the right to make my life hell.
SCOTUS knows that buffer zones work, that is why they employ one themselves.
This is not about freedom of speech this is the tacit approval of terrorism.
Just for some of you questioning what is and is not harassment and stalking
Harassment is governed by state laws, which vary by state, but is generally defined as a course of conduct which annoys, threatens, intimidates, alarms, or puts a person in fear of their safety. Harassment is unwanted, unwelcomed and uninvited behavior that demeans, threatens or offends the victim and results in a hostile environment for the victim. Harassing behavior may include, but is not limited to, epithets, derogatory comments or slurs and lewd propositions, assault, impeding or blocking movement, offensive touching or any physical interference with normal work or movement, and visual insults, such as derogatory posters or cartoons
http://definitions.uslegal.com/...
Stalking for example Massachusetts.
ALM GL ch. 265, § 43. Stalking. (2010)
(a) Whoever (1) willfully and maliciously engages in a knowing pattern of conduct or series of acts over a period of time directed at a specific person which seriously alarms or annoys that person and would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress,