Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
First amendment of the Bill of Rights, emphasis mine.
Follow me over the fold for my thoughts.
During the Reagan Administration Anti Trust laws were reinterpreted. No laws were changed, just re-interpreted. Here, here, and here.
Scalia notoriously said that torture is not "cruel and unusual punishment", because, in so many words, torture comes before judgement and punishment comes after judgement, and therefore torture is not unconstitutional.
My points are that 1) Laws need not be repealed to be overturned, and 2) the activist Supreme Court is not Congress, and so it is Constitutional to a) make Corporations into people, and b) allow Corporations to have religious "beliefs" woven into the Federal Law of the land. Hey - Congress didn't do it so, in Scalia's interpretation, Hobby Lobby is all good.
I am not a lawyer, but I think that the SCOTUS has just established religion. And a definite religion - Catholic Christianity. No Sharia law.