This is an open message to our USSC, why should you 9 people be forced to overwrite, or rewrite, or uphold as is this law? The simple, best, optimum and fair solution to this is for the court to simply send this bill back to the congress where it was ostensibly written and either let congress fix, rewrite, or allow to remain as it is this language. It's not up to the court to determine the meaning of this pretty clear language, if so, then the court will be forced to deny the subsides to those insured purely on the federal exchanges.
So, in short why should the court split hairs over what the congress really meant when it could, and I repeat, simply instruct the congress to affirm or alter this language.
I'd like to thank Daily Kos for inviting me back to write here, I have missed it. I must say looking back at my previous work that I should be here writing. I'll keep it short. My opinion was and still is providing universal healthcare through a for profit insurance cartel and a for profit health industry is probably not the best way to go. Without getting rid of our health system as is, the Feds could have come up with a better way to deliver services universally to those that need them than through this for profit system, the conflict of interest is or should be obvious and is becoming more obvious everyday as premiums ratchet up.