Yes, she just said that at the NH Town Hall. My God what arrogance! What a moral compass1
And why did she take such a large amount? Because they offered it! In fact, they forced her to take it at gun point. Maybe that is why she has turned into such a huge control advocate! She doesn’t want any other politicians to be forced to take such huge sums of lucre. She didn’t negotiate one little iota with Goldman Sachs. No contract needed I guess.
And sense there was no media, what special little tidbits did she give them that the rest of didn’t know about Osama? Does everyone have to drop $250k on her to get this inside info?
There was so much wrong in tonight’s town hall that she said, but this little gem was like the diamond on the top of the cake.
This is why she has a trust issue with so many of us. She thinks she can say shit, and do shit, and not pay a price. She thinks we are so stupid that we will believe that she had nothing to do with what Goldman paid her. She thinks we are so stupid that we will believe that this money will not influence her policies and who she appoints to positions. Unbelievable.
But the good thing is there more and more people who are waking up and do not buy this bullshit any longer.
Here is the link to CNN
Thursday, Feb 4, 2016 · 4:57:18 AM +00:00
·
kaminpdx
Some are arguing she meant that she didn’t give them something in return like a quid pro quo. But that isn’t what she said. If that is what she meant she would have said something to the affect, “but I didn’t give them anything in return which would be true because at that time she wasn’t in a position to. However, with all the $$$ they are sticking in her PAC they think she will be in the future.