I have made great efforts to inform people of the real and present national security threats that Global Warming poses to our great nation. I have worked to research and write what I have found to be credible scientific analysis and realistic, necessary solutions.
In all of this time, we were mostly together on this, taking to heart what the science really had to say, damned the ditherings of a lying Republican Paid-to-Deny group of sociopaths and pushed on to a greater understanding of truth. However, in all of that work, I have never seen a group of people so hell bent on now, refusing to take to heart the real implications (with regard to electability) of what is going on with the ongoing criminal investigation surrounding Hillary Clinton’s private server, the loss of control of high-security information and the potential for it to ALREADY have dovetailed into a public corruption investigation of the Clinton Foundation’s donations from sovereign governments while they had business before the U.S. State Department during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State.
.
.
.
.
.
.
John Dickerson — Democrats in Washington are concerned that there is going to be an indictment in the criminal investigation of your email server.
Hillary Clinton — There is no basis for worries of an impending indictment because this is not a criminal investigation but rather, a “security review”
However. . .
New York Times — March 2, 2016
The F.B.I.’s case did begin as a security referral from the inspectors general of the State Department and the nation’s intelligence agencies, who were concerned that classified information might have been stored outside a secure government network. But multiple law enforcement officials said the matter quickly became an investigation into whether anyone had committed a crime in handling classified information.
The Washington Post — March 2, 2016
The Clinton campaign has described the probe as a security review. But current and former officials in the FBI and at the Justice Department have said investigators are trying to determine whether a crime was committed.
The Washington Post — March 3, 2016
The FBI is looking to wrap up the Clinton inquiry — a criminal investigation of the possible mishandling of classified information — in the coming months, according to a senior U.S. law enforcement official. There are no outward signs that prosecutors have convened a grand jury, a powerful tool that would allow them to subpoena witnesses.
CNN — March 5, 2016
The big question is whether there is a grand jury convened. The smart bet is yes. After all, the fact that there are immunity agreements logically means there's a grand jury investigation in some district. The grand jury is typically the genesis of the government's subpoena power. The next, bigger question, is whether anyone will be indicted.
LawNewz — March 3, 2016
“If it is a process that is usually used that means a Grand Jury has been impaneled, and federal prosecutors sought testimony of the witness (Pagliano) who invoked his Fifth Amendment rights. The next step in that process is that the prosecutors ask U.S. Attorney GeneralLoretta Lynch to grant immunity, and then they take that request to a district judge,” former U.S. Attorney Paul Charlton told LawNewz.com.
In addition, Pagliano’s immunity is likely the result of what’s called a “proffer.” A proffer is an agreement between a prosecutor and a witness to provide information about a crime, with the assurance he won’t be prosecuted. It’s kind of like a sneak peak of what the prosecutors will get if the witness ends up giving testimony.
The Atlantic — March 5, 2016
A former aide to Hillary Clinton has been granted immunity in a criminal investigation, and the FBI is expected to question Clinton herself soon.
let me be clear:
you and me both John, you and me both . .. .