Skip to main content

 Why in the world is Fixed Noise (a supposed "news" organization) electioneering for the GOP? Well, since an great majority of its viewers are Conservative and Conservative-leaning Independents still believe that the SCLM is so "Radical Leftist and in bed with Obama, so Fox News is telling the truth." Now, on top of this, they are fundraising for GOP elections while being paid employees of Fox News Channel.

 There are several documented examples of this: Dick Morris repeatedly touts his website to promote fundraising for Republicans, Sean Hannity has had a long history of active promotion of Conservative causes repeatedly on both his radio and television shows, Mike Huckabee overtly and repeatedly did so on his show, Huckabee, and other FNC shows, Sarah Palin's SarahPAC, and others. A REAL news organization would NOT tolerate such behavior-- at least not openly. Almost all of them would be fired and/or suspended if they did it at MSNBC or CNN.

 This is only the tip of the iceberg for its electioneering tactics. The FEC may have to step in eventually.

The Moody Memos: Fox News operates on the "honor system"
Fox News finds itself embroiled in an ethics firestorm for one simple reason: They don't appear to have any rules that actually regulate their employees' political conduct.

Back in 2004, then-Fox News VP John Moody reportedly circulated a policy "discourag[ing]," but not banning, employees from donating to political candidates

http://mediamatters.org/...

Fox News hosts and contributors continue to raise money for Republican candidates and causes using political action committees, 527 and 501(c)4 organizations.

Ed Schultz asks why Fox contributors and hosts are allowed to raise money for GOP

http://mediamatters.org/...

In yesterday's Media Matters press release, Fixed News promised to keep a tighter reign on its employees doing such nonsense, but John Stossel-- despite not being told to cancel his fundraising luncheon on June 4th, 2010, in Houston, Texas-- most likely will NOT be reprimanded for this. This is only an pretend illusion so FNC and FBN maintains a slight bit of integrity, which neither network has. First, Fox Noise has forgotten its "Zero Tolerance" policy on incorrect chyrons. Then, discouraging cheerleading for the Tea Parties, when clear-cut evidence shows that they did so intentionally to gin up the crowd. I predict Faux News will lie about their intentions (like always).

UPDATE (04.21.2010, 11:52AM CDT):
A new report on Fixed Noise's electioneering, via Media Matters.

http://mediamatters.org/...

In recent years, at least twenty Fox News personalities have endorsed, raised money, or campaigned for Republican candidates or causes, or against Democratic candidates or causes, in more than 300 instances and in at least 49 states. Republican parties and officials have routinely touted these personalities' affiliations with Fox News to sell and promote their events.

Originally posted to JGibson on Tue Apr 20, 2010 at 10:41 PM PDT.

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

    •  FEC law and jurisdiction (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      doinaheckuvanutjob

      I know little about the FEC and the laws it enforces. Is there a specific law that would prohibit a Fox News cable TV host from being an active fund raiser for GOP candidates?

      "let's talk about that"

      by VClib on Tue Apr 20, 2010 at 11:08:20 PM PDT

      [ Parent ]

      •  I suppose Melothe would be the test? (2+ / 0-)
        Recommended by:
        oxon, gravlax

        From Media Matters ...

        So the question must now be raised: Is Fox News' relentlessly one-sided coverage the equivalent of a massive campaign contribution to the GOP? And based on some recent regulatory language used by the FEC, the answer might just be "yes."

        The media matters piece then dissects how the FEC first dismissed earlier complaints about political advocacy brought by conservative groups - then contrasts that with how they handled Melothe's plea for a neutrality exception.

        Let's look at the case of the recent start-up company Melothe Inc., which petitioned the FEC for a press exemption. Melothe described itself as a Web-based TV station that would go inside the campaigns of Democratic candidates and provide Web video and programming that would be of special interest to Democrats and progressives.
        :: ::
        But Melothe did not qualify for the exemption, as explained in a November 13, 2008, memorandum, signed by FEC's general counsel. Even though the FEC and the courts have used a very liberal definition of "press entity" for the exemption, the Commission ruled that Melothe did not qualify because it would essentially be indistinguishable from the interests of its chosen candidates.

        The linked PDF includes some interesting language - which focuses on the money.

        The Commission concludes that Melothe, Inc.'s proposed activity is not encompassed by
        the press exemption. The facts presented indicate that Melothe, Inc. proposes to engage in
        activities that are not within the legitimate press function of a media entity
        .

        So, what would those activities be then?

        Melothe, Inc.'s proposal, however, further indicates that Melothe, Inc. intends to engage in core campaign activities that are not legitimate press functions. Melothe, Inc envisions that program hosts, interviewers and news anchors will regularly solicit contributions, with links to the candidate's contribution page appearing on the screen during programming.

        As Media Matters opines, "Sounds familiar?"

        no remuneration was received by anyone for the writing of this message

        by ItsSimpleSimon on Wed Apr 21, 2010 at 04:22:46 AM PDT

        [ Parent ]

  •  Glad to see (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    Randall Sherman, gravlax

    you weren't deterred by your Kos welcome with your first diary.

    This is a very good second one.

  •  Didn't the Cheney/Bush regime (3+ / 0-)

    effectively bury the FEC?  By not naming anybody to it, they shut it down.

    If you want to kill something/somebody, starve it to death . . . or put an idiot in charge.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site