Skip to main content

Warren Buffett has fired a proverbial shot that is sure to send GOP leaders shrieking to their favorite conservative media outlets.  In a race already dominated by the spending of billionaires such as Charles and David Koch, Sheldon Adelson and others, Buffet just bigfooted them all. So far, the conservative Super PACs American Crossroads, Restore our Future and Americans for Prosperity have spent about $80 million dollars on the presidential election, far more than the official Romney campaign.

Warren Buffett

Buffett's answer: I see your $80 mil and raise you $920 million.* Yes, a cool one billion for the pro-Obama Super PAC Priorities USA Action.

More below the doodle.

Previously, Buffet was reluctant to inject his money into the race:

"I don't want to see democracy go in that direction."
But Buffet eventually realized that a silent protest against the Supreme Court's ruling in the Citizen United case was likely to have little or no effect. In fact, the only effect it might have would be the election of Mitt Romney as President of the United States, a result which would only confirm in Antonin Scalia's mind that Citizen's United was correctly decided.
"I decided that the only way to really make a statement about the danger of allowing billionaires to buy elections was to plunk down my own money and give conservatives what frightened them the most, a second term for Barack Obama. Plus, he deserves it."*
This is so true. The only thing the will make conservatives such as Scalia rethink the wisdom of Citizens United is to lose an election while be outspent by the richest man of all. Well played Warren!


*Note: I made this up. The only part that's true is the amount spent so far by the conservative PACs (compared to only $7 million by Priorities USA!) and the fact that Buffett won't contribute to Super PACs on principle. I think it's mistake: a unilateral disarming that won't change anyone's opinion about the wisdom of billionaires buying elections. Do you agree? Can we send a message to Warren Buffett? Other rich Democrats? If you want the CU case reconsidered, you've got beat them at their own game. And a note to Warren or Warren's people: dude, you turn 82 in a few weeks. You can't take it with you. Make a difference with it while you have the chance!

Link for billionaires to contribute to here.

Link for you and me (Obama campaign) here.

Photo from flickr user markgregory007.

12:07 PM PT: Update: Some got hooked in by this and then annoyed. But that was kind of my point. Do you realize what a huge impact a massive Buffett contribution would have? It would dominate political news for a while and really generation discussion about the wisdom of our current political process. Of course it would also negate the millions spent on the other side. Bonus! Apologies for snarking you cruelly.


Buffett should make a big contribution to Priorities USA

15%47 votes
39%123 votes
36%114 votes
8%26 votes

| 310 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site