Skip to main content

Republican U.S. presidential candidate Mitt Romney (R-MA) gestures as he speaks at the American Conservative Union's annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in Washington, February 10, 2012.  REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst   (UNITED STATES - Tags:
In case you haven't seen it, here's Mitt Romney's statement last night trying to exploit the attacks against American diplomats in Libya and Egypt for political gain:
I’m outraged by the attacks on American diplomatic missions in Libya and Egypt and by the death of an American consulate worker in Benghazi. It’s disgraceful that the Obama administration’s first response was not to condemn attacks on our diplomatic missions, but to sympathize with those who waged the attacks.
It was immediately obvious that this statement was as crass as it was desperate—Romney, who couldn't bring himself to thank American troops serving in Afghanistan during his acceptance speech, and whose campaign dismissed foreign policy as a "shiny object" just yesterday, suddenly deciding to elevate foreign policy? Clearly, any time something bad happens to America, Romney sees it as an opportunity to score points. I'm not saying he was happy last night, but he sure was fast to attempt to capitalize, wasn't he?

This kind of political opportunism isn't surprising coming from Mitt Romney. It's just another example of his utter lack of conviction—other than the conviction that he is entitled to do or say whatever it takes to win. But what this statement does illustrate is that Mitt Romney doesn't have what it takes to be president. Political attacks are one thing. But Romney launched this particular political attack without knowing all the facts.

As it turns out, four Americans were killed, including our Ambassador to Libya. Romney issued his statement before those basic facts were in. Given the nature of Romney's statement—a political attack based on a false characterization of what President Obama had done—that sort of shooting from the hip reveals a lack of impulse control that we simply cannot afford to have in a president.

So yes, I'm angry that Mitt Romney is trying to exploit this. But the recklessness with which he tried to exploit this is even more troubling. If you have your finger on the nuclear button, you need to be cool, calm, and collected. And Mitt Romney's response shows that he's not.

6:42 AM PT: President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton will give a statement from the White House at 10:35 AM ET. If Mitt Romney wants to see how a real president conducts himself (or herself, for that matter), he should tune in.

6:48 AM PT:
Boehner, Cantor and Rubio statements this AM do not echo Romney's. They neither mention Obama nor slam the administration's response.
@PhilipRucker via TweetDeck

6:49 AM PT: Secretary Clinton will give a statement before the President's Rose Garden statement, but she will attend the White House event.

6:50 AM PT: Mitch McConnell following in the footsteps of John Boehner and Eric Cantor: "We will stand united in our response," he says on the senate floor.

6:55 AM PT: Very weird:

Romney will hold a press conference to address Libya/Egypt here in Jacksonville. People at event now being escorted out of the room.
@mckaycoppins via web

6:59 AM PT: Secretary Clinton is delivering her comments now. "This is an attack that should shock the conscience of people of all faiths. We condemn in the strongest terms this senseless act of violence."

7:02 AM PT: This is even weirder:

CNN says Romney remarks canceled, he will instead issue a statement.
@ByronTau via TweetDeck
I'm watching a live feed from where Romney's event was supposed to be, and I can't quite figure out what is going on. There is still a podium set up with flags behind it.

7:05 AM PT: "Let me be clear, there is no justification for violence like this," Clinton says. Are you listening Mitt?

7:11 AM PT:
Romney event today not canceled. it will be held AFTER the press avail (per pool)
@samsteinhp via TweetDeck

7:15 AM PT: How's the Romney attack playing? NBC's Firs tRead:

Yesterday we noted that Mitt Romney, down in the polls after the convention, was throwing the kitchen sink at President Obama. Little did we know the kitchen sink would include -- on the anniversary of 9/11 -- one of the most over-the-top and (it turns out) incorrect attacks of the general-election campaign .

7:16 AM PT: Romney just took podium.

7:19 AM PT: "I also believe the administration was wrong to stand by a statement sympathizing" with the attackers "instead of condemning" the attackers. Two sentences later, Romney says the administration "distanced itself" from the statement that he just said it had stood by. Romney can't even keep his story straight from sentence to sentence. But he's standing by his attack.

7:21 AM PT: Romney is digging himself so deep here.

7:22 AM PT:
OMG, Romney is not only lying about the nature of Cairo Embassy statement - but is criticizing embassy officials that were under attack
@speechboy71 via Twitter for Mac

7:23 AM PT: Did Romney jump the gun? "I don't think we ever hesitate when we see something which is a violation of our principals."

7:23 AM PT: Then he says he won't respond to hypotheticals about what he would have said had he actually known what has happening in Egypt.

7:24 AM PT: I'd like to see a reporter ask Romney to quote from a statement issued by the administration and say specifically what he disagreed with. Because so far as I can tell, everything he is saying he's making up out of thin air.

7:25 AM PT:
Romney simultaneously saying Obama admin wrong and that it had same reaction as he did.
@ThePlumLineGS via TweetDeck

7:25 AM PT: "The embassy of the United States issued what appeared to be an apology for American principals. That was a mistake." And then Romney leaves podium.

7:28 AM PT:
Embarrassed yet, conservatives?
@LOLGOP via TweetDeck

Tags

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

GainesT1958, Sylv, Bill in Portland Maine, daninoah, karlpk, Shockwave, byteb, just another vet, cotterperson, hyperstation, eeff, Walt starr, hubcap, Heart of the Rockies, DickCheneyBeforeHeDicksYou, CoolOnion, Minerva, Voter123, itskevin, Quege, tomephil, Nag, hangingchad, figbash, chickeee, Lilith, econlibVA, KayCeSF, lyvwyr101, eztempo, vcmvo2, marina, 3goldens, Ckntfld, revbludge, KnotIookin, kitchen sink think tank, dewtx, boofdah, Beetwasher, zinger99, FindingMyVoice, Debbie in ME, flying shams, Russgirl, Gorette, kestrel9000, ccmask, SherriG, gpoutney, agnostic, Libby Shaw, Friend of the court, Pandoras Box, Cronesense, Suzanne 3, flumptytail, Templar, millwood, pioneer111, exreaganite, M Sullivan, billso, TomP, Empower Ink, rontun, pamelabrown, luckylizard, get the red out, venger, MinervainNH, Guadalupe59, MrsTarquinBiscuitbarrel, artmartin, juca, kravitz, manucpa, johnosahon, COwoman, susan in sc, Larsstephens, Clyde the Cat, smileycreek, marabout40, willynel, estreya, gramofsam1, politik, michelewln, BenderRodriguez, Lost and Found, mjbleo, laserhaas, ZedMont, verdeo, no way lack of brain, Onomastic, spooks51, Bob Duck, jd texas, cv lurking gf, Mr MadAsHell, Olympia, Intheknow, Nicci August, PorridgeGun, sethtriggs, thomask, BarackStarObama, SueM1121, loblolly, Dreidlgirl, Liberal Mole, Vatexia, jolux, ratcityreprobate, VeloVixen, thejoshuablog, Proud Liberal Dem, ParkRanger, ArtemisBSG, mikeVA, RhodaA, Catskill Julie, TheLizardKing, Siri, Citizenpower, IndieGuy, David54, AreDeutz, willrob, radical simplicity, Nztorg, wxorknot, Vote4Obamain2012, arizonablue, brook, history first, ShoshannaD, GoGoGoEverton, Graypets, ebailey, LiberalSage, entrelac, Aunt Pat, howabout, LaraJones, Icicle68, OregonWetDog, KHKS

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site