Skip to main content

Remember what Schoolhouse Rock told us about how a bill becomes law? Believe none of that. According to Jere Royall, counsel and director of Community Impact at the N.C. Family Policy Council, that's old, useless, outdated stuff. How a bill becomes a law "nowadays," says Royall, is that organizations like his talk with legislators and propose models that lack foundational data and ask the legislators to accept their suggestions and come up with the data themselves, question the premises of the organization's lobbying efforts, and insert all of that into a months-long or years-long discussion on the merits and detriments of the organization's proposal.

I learned about the idylls of lawmaking processes during a (very protracted and circuitous) conversation with Royall today that started when I called N.C. Sen. Austin Allran (R-42) to ask about a bill he's sponsoring in the N.C. General Assembly to impose a two-year waiting period on divorce in North Carolina.

My question: Considering the correlation between domestic violence and the time period around the divorce/separation of a couple, do the data find an increase or decrease in domestic violence with the imposition of a two-year waiting period?

Sen. Allran's staffer's answer? "We don't know. The senator is sponsoring this on behalf of the N.C. Family Policy Council, and you can call them and ask that question. Their number is 919-807-0800."

And so we were off to the races. Follow the bunny around the little orange track.

I asked my question to Jere Royall, who lobbied for the bill with Sen. Allran. Royall didn't know the answer. Does he know whether any studies were conducted to determine the impact of a two-year waiting period on domestic violence?

"Well," he said, "that's how legislation works. We put something forward, and the legislators can ask us all their questions and we obtain the information and get it to them. If they have additional questions, we get those answers, too."

So I'm asking, I said. What studies were conducted to determine the impact of an additional waiting period on domestic violence?

The N.C. Family Policy Council hasn't actually conducted any studies, said Royall. But if I would go visit the Coalition for Divorce Reform, I could get all my answers there.

What if Sen. Allran asked for research citations? Oh, said Royall, he would get that information from the Coalition for Divorce Reform and give that information to the senator.

Apparently, Sen. Allran hasn't asked for research citations before drafting his bill. So ... let's say a voter asked for them? Again, a referral to the Coalition for Divorce Reform.

When asked for a copy of the needs assessment for imposing a two-year waiting period on divorce in N.C., Royall said that divorce used to be more difficult in our state until the 1960s, when the law was changed to permit divorce after "only" a one-year wait -- and the divorce rate doubled. It would seem logical, then, that the divorce rate could be cut in half by going back to the pre-1960s standard of a two-year wait.

And what about the unintended consequences -- what about the domestic-violence issues? Well, there are "exceptions" that would eventually be written into the bill if Sen. Allran and his colleagues wanted them.

The legislation proposes covering all married couples with minor children, with the exception of:
spouses who are victims of domestic violence
spouses who have been abandoned for 18 months
spouses married to felons sentenced to prison for five years or longer or convicted of sexual offenses against a spouse or children
spouses married to alcoholics and drug addicts refusing treatment
How would these exceptions be granted? A spouse requesting the exception could simply provide documentation from their police department and families, says Royall.

How do law-enforcement agencies feel about being put into the documentation-producing business? Royall didn't know, because the N.C. Family Policy Council hasn't researched those issues yet.

What if a spouse's family didn't want to go on record about their family member's addiction to alcohol/drugs and treatment history? Royall said that's probably not a real issue, because "the vast majority of strong families" would want to help keep families together.

Royall further explained that if North Carolina were to adopt the Coalition for Divorce Reform's and the N.C. Family Policy Council's stance on waiting periods for divorce, our state could become the model that produces data needed for other stands to take a stand against easy divorce.

I called Sen. Allran's office again and asked him to take the bill down until further research has been conducted into the role of law-enforcement agencies in protecting vulnerable families during a two-year waiting period.

And an examination into state fiscal implications of imposing requirements on divorcing spouses that would require specific documentation from state and municipal law-enforcement agencies, court officials, and whoever provides proof to meet an "18-month abandonment" requirement.

What if individidual household costs of obtaining all this documentation make divorce prohibitive for most North Carolinians -- would there be a fund to help out, or would that be measured as a "success" of the law?

Sen. Allran's staff had no answer at their fingertips. They did, however, refer me to the N.C. Family Policy Council at 919-807-0800.

7:50 PM PT: Received a call late this afternoon from Jere Royall from the N.C. Family Policy Council. He agreed that there's a need for more research into unintended consequences of imposing a two-year wait on couples who wish to marry. His office has asked for input from the Wake County Sheriff's Office and the Raleigh Police Department. I suggested he also request data from the State Bureau of the Investigation and that he check with the U.S. Department of Justice and the FBI, as his organization also participates in lobbying organizations that work on nationwide "divorce reform." And that he ensure that his lobby's "divorce reform" doesn't have  implications that would violate the Violence Against Women Act.

We agreed to disagree on policy but to agree that more data are necessary before moving forward, so that lives, safety, and individuals' futures can be protected.

Originally posted to MsSpentyouth on Mon Apr 01, 2013 at 11:13 AM PDT.

Also republished by North Carolina BLUE.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Let's return to the pre-1960s, when (12+ / 0-)

    "Leave It to Beaver" was a documentary for our times.

  •  Politicians are exceptionally lazy. (4+ / 0-)

    They just throw something at the wall to see if it sticks. If it seems to have something to do with family values then all the better.

    Hard to believe we have turned our government over to the lobbyists to do as they wish. It's a sad state of affairs and we are all screwed because of it.

  •  NC is rapidly degrading (3+ / 0-)

    I sit here in the Piedmont woods wondering how bad it will get. The repubs keep rolling back everything way past before the 60's.
     All the Democrats seem to care about here is the Presidential election. Midterms are a neglected entity. And so ALEC continues to grow influence in day to day NC life.      
     After a two year waiting period doesn't work, what will they come up with next; five years, no divorce whatsoever?
     What a shame. NC was looking good for a couple of years. When and if the Dems ever make a comeback, they won't even undo all the repub damage. These laws tend to stick around, even after.

    "The United States is a nation of laws: badly written and randomly enforced." -Zappa My Site

    by meagert on Mon Apr 01, 2013 at 11:44:33 AM PDT

    •  Agreed 100% (3+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:
      smiley7, meagert, myboo

      Every single day brings a dozen epic tales of revenge, vigilantism, turning over the GA to the lobbyists, and everything else, all the way down to greed and stupidity.

      And you're right -- we may never be able to undo all the damage. Which is why so many of us are running around trying to stomp out these little prairie fires before they consume the whole state, but there are far too many fires and far too few stompers.

      Midterms? School board elections? Municipal candidates? These are not getting the attention they deserve. And I think that's part of the plan -- keep the outrages happening so fast and at such a rapid pace that we lose sight of non-presidential elections and let Teh Others roll over us on the local and lobbyist levels.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site