Skip to main content

Oh, this has got to hurt.  Just when you thought things were getting bad for Mark Sanford, they're getting worse and Elizabeth Colbert-Busch seems to be better at getting GOP support than Sanford.  Who would think a liberal Democrat like Colbert-Busch could get this kind of support?

He can't even get his own base fired up.  Sounds like Sanford is becoming another Mitt Romney:

A group called "Republicans for Elizabeth Colbert Busch" announced their support for the Democrat saying they feel she is the best candidate for the state's 1st Congressional District seat.

Some of the speakers went on to say they no longer trust Mark Sanford.

"I realized she's pretty moderate, she's not a liberal Democrat," said Leslie Turner, chair of Republicans for Elizabeth Colbert Busch."She could be called a moderate Republican if she hadn't already labeled herself a Democrat. The race is not about labels, it's about choosing the best candidate for the job. I want to vote for the candidate who has integrity solid character and good values."

Here's more on the Republican support for Elizabeth Colbert-Busch per Mount Pleasant Patch:

Elizabeth Colbert Busch would have a tough time winning the First Congressional District seat without some Republican support. After all, 58 percent of the district's voters supported Mitt Romney in the 2012 election, so the announcement of Republicans for Elizabeth Colbert Busch is a welcome development for the campaign.

Colbert Busch announced the formation of the group flanked by several of her GOP supporters Wednesday at her West Ashley Campaign office. Chairing the group is Leslie Turner, a 2012 Romney voter.

Turner said when former Gov. Mark Sanford emerged as the Republican candidate in the First District race she had no choice but to pick Colbert Busch as the best candidate for the job.

"I want our country to pay our debts, stop spending more than we have, get our finances in order, basically get this country back on track, and there's one person in this race who can do just that," Turner said. "She can tackle the issues and go to Washington and be someone that we can be proud of, and that's Elizabeth Colbert Busch."

This is very interesting.  The group is being chaired by a Romney 2012 voter, someone Barack Obama could never convince.  However, because Mark Sanford emerged as the Republican nominee in this Congressional race, the tides have turned in favor of Colbert-Busch.

Ok.  Let me be blunt:  Republican support for a Democratic candidate helps him/her with the ability to appeal to conservative base but doesn't necessarily guarantee victory.  There were Republicans for John Kerry in 2004 and that wasn't enough for him to be elected.  Of course, there were also Republicans for Barack Obama in 2008 and 2012 of course, President Obama did win both elections.

However, Colbert-Busch's situation is different.  She's running to replace a former Tea Party Congressman who is now Senator Tim Scott, who has replaced former Tea Party evangelist in the U.S. Senate Jim DeMint.  She's also running in a district in South Carolina where the last Democrat who represented it was Mendel Jackson Davis from 1971-1981.  And the district was represented in 1995-2001 by, you won't believe it, Mark Sanford!  He wants his seat back badly, doesn't he?

Turner was one of about a half-dozen Republicans in attendance for the announcement at Colbert Busch's campaign office. But that number belies how much support Colbert Busch is receiving from traditional GOP voters Turner said.

Glenda Miller, a self-described life-long Republican, also spoke out for Colbert Busch, and said she'll be telling all of her Republican friends to vote for the Democratic candidate in this election as well.

"Elizabeth is a Democrat but I want to assure my Republican friends that should not stop them from voting for her," Miller said. "She's a tough independent business woman who has spent her whole career creating jobs and balancing budgets. Her business experience is the core of who she is, and I know that she, unlike her opponent will represent us in Washington."

And we do need more Democrats with business experience.

Now this is where it gets REAL good.  Glenda Miller, a life-long Republican who supported Sanford's opponent John Kuhn in the primary and then Curtis Bostic in the run-off, decided to support Elizabeth Colbert-Busch because of Sanford's conduct.

Miller said she initially voted for John Kuhn in the primary election and supported Curtis Bostic in the run-off. She didn't make up her mind to support Colbert Busch until she saw Sanford's full-page ad in response to revelations that he was charged with trespassing at his ex-wife's house in February that ran in Sunday's Post and Courier.
Well, then it was probably a dumb idea for Mark Sanford to run for Congress after all.  Apparently he thought voters in South Carolina's 1st Congressional District would get over his past conduct.  He sure is a bright person, isn't he?
Miller cannot forget that Sanford disappeared for a week while he was governor without letting anyone in the state know he was gone or how to get in touch with him if an emergency arose.

"If I took money from my employer and then went out of town for a week, I'm sure I would loose my job," Miller said. "I also would not be eligible to be rehired. Mark Sanford took our tax dollars and abandoned his position as Governor of South Carolina. I don't think he should be rehired as a public servant. He is not the kind of person I think should represent us in Congress."

Yep, Mark Sanford is certainly in a race alright.  And he may very well will lose more GOP voter support as the time comes.  Doesn't mean we should snack on popcorn and party while the race continues but we should continue to fight like we're 10 points down!

How about some love for Elizabeth Colbert-Busch?

Campaign Website:



5:19 PM PT: Nearly 600 likes and 5 tweets.  And we have two weeks left.

Can Mark Sanford screw up again?  Oh he sure can!  He's become the protegee of Mitt Romney!


Big question: Who are you supporting?

66%77 votes
1%2 votes
14%17 votes
14%17 votes
0%0 votes
1%2 votes

| 115 votes | Vote | Results

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

  •  Makes it sound like she will be a blue dog (0+ / 0-)


    Many times I’ve returned. Never was I the same in any of my guises. I feel inside, my times before, with no memories of each journey. My soul’s shadows haunt all the paths it has traveled.

    by Wendys Wink on Fri Apr 26, 2013 at 01:58:28 PM PDT

  •  pipsorcle, you seem to have copied all or (0+ / 0-)

    nearly all of the article. Do you hold the copyright or did you get permission? If not, please edit.

    •  It's hard to edit to be honest (1+ / 0-)
      Recommended by:

      Normally I only copy sections of any source I refer in any of  my diaries but the deal is, I'm trying to make a point in this one particularly and the information there is relevant with the points I'm making.  I can try to edit my diary with the information that is cited to make key points in but then I'd be leaving out information to back my point.

      Understand, I'm not trying to cherry pick the information.  The diary has a lot of relevant information and it's a short article, not a long one.

      I'm really not sure what the issue is with copyrighting unless I didn't otherwise reference the website URL of the article.  I write research papers and essays all the time with citations, references and such but with diaries, I'm not exactly sure what the purpose is with copyrighting here.  If it means no entire article must be published on Daily Kos, then surely that means traffic could very well be driven from the page to the Daily Kos page.

      •  I understand your dilemma and it comes from (0+ / 0-)

        wanting to be clear and provide supporting documentation. However, copyright violation comes under the heading of "Immediately bannable behavior." (I'm NOT advocating for that, of course, just trying to steer you in the right direction.) I've heard the FAQ is no longer findable, but here's an excerpt from what's published at the help desk.

        Copyright violations. Most things you run across are well-covered by fair use: taking snippets of someone else's text in order to make a point of your own is protected, for example. But taking protected works in their (near or full) entirety clearly violates copyright law, in most cases. See the various online discussions of the doctrine of fair use.
        From Help Desk
        If you go to the link, you'll find the "fair use" part is linked to a Wikipedia discussion of fair use. You might find that useful in the future. Credit is an issue, but it is not THE issue.  

        Some people use 3 paragraphs as a rough guide, although that is not a legal rule and it depends on other factors such as the length of the total work.

        I'm not sure what your last sentence means or how quoting the entire article drives Patch traffic to Daily Kos, but traffic isn't the point. You can't just quote an entire copyrighted article without permission. I haven't HR'ed, but I have sent the issue to admin for however they might choose to address it. I'll leave it there, but I encourage you to read up on "fair use."

  •  Sounds like a fraction of the Republicans (2+ / 0-)
    Recommended by:
    elwior, Lujane

    in South Carolina have decided not to stick with crazy. Business types. Sanford is bad for bidness, Colbert-Busch? She'll show up, that's a good start.
    I wonder if this is just a pocket of slightly less insane Republicans or a larger re-emergence from their long nightmare.

    If I ran this circus, things would be DIFFERENT!

    by CwV on Fri Apr 26, 2013 at 02:40:53 PM PDT

  •  Could someone please explain... (0+ / 0-)

    Why are we, in general, better off with a conservadem than a Republiccan? Granted, i hate Sannford, and would gradly see the worst conservadem defeat him, just for spite. Has Colbert-Busch given any indication that she is anything better than a pro-corporatiion centrist?

    Workers of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your shackles. It is by the picket line and direct action that true freedom will be won, not by electing people who promise to screw us less than the other guy.

    by rhonan on Fri Apr 26, 2013 at 04:53:26 PM PDT

  •  U sure they don't think she's George Ws sister? (0+ / 0-)

    I appreciate the sentiments of the informed Republicans that are organizing for her, I really do, but I'm worried about what will happen with all those Republican voters that will eventually find out that their feeling of kinship with her because she can't spell her last name correctly, is misplaced.

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site