Skip to main content

By now, you should probably know that Niall Ferguson is a conservative troll. Last summer, when Tina Brown's Newsweek couldn't find a story about a Muslim woman breastfeeding her child while fellating a vegetable (because we all know that would have been Brown's DREAM cover), the friendly folks at Newsweek decided to run a factually-challenged screed against the Affordable Care Act by Niall.  Paul Krugman harshly criticized the column, noting, "We're not talking about ideology or even economic analysis here — just a plain misrepresentation of the facts, with an august publication letting itself be used to misinform readers."

If you don't remember Ferguson from that, you may remember him because of his long history of imperialist apologetics, his paeans to the British Empire for bringing freedom and democracy to the "primitive" peoples of the world.   Never mind the use of concentration camps in the Boer War.  Never mind the gulags, murder, and torture in Kenya.  Never mind the countless atrocities committed in India.  Never mind the continued and often brutal resistance to allowing genuine self-rule in the colonies.  They just couldn't understand "freedom" as the Brits could.

Anyways, I'm bringing up Ferguson because of the latest example of his ignorance and conservative trolldom.

According to Financial Advisor's Tom Kostigen, at the Tenth Annual Altegris Conference in Carlsbad, California, Niall Ferguson argued that Keynesianism is wrong because of Keynes's sexuality:

Ferguson responded to a question about Keynes' famous philosophy of self-interest versus the economic philosophy of Edmund Burke, who believed there was a social contract among the living, as well as the dead. Ferguson asked the audience how many children Keynes had. He explained that Keynes had none because he was a homosexual and was married to a ballerina, with whom he likely talked of "poetry" rather than procreated. The audience went quiet at the remark. Some attendees later said they found the remarks offensive.

It gets worse.

Ferguson, who is the Laurence A. Tisch Professor of History at Harvard University, and author of The Great Degeneration: How Institutions Decay and Economies Die, says it's only logical that Keynes would take this selfish worldview because he was an "effete" member of society. Apparently, in Ferguson's world, if you are gay or childless, you cannot care about future generations nor society.

First of all, this is an ad hominem attack.  As anyone who knows the smallest bit about logic or rhetoric remembers, this is a logical fallacy that has no place in reasoned debate.

Second, there is a factual error.  John Maynard Keynes was bisexual; he had relationships with both men and women.  He was married to a woman, the aforementioned ballerina.  His wife unfortunately had a miscarriage, so Keynes did, in fact, almost have a child.

More importantly, the argument that people cannot care about future generations unless they have children is simply offensive and groundless.  I have to wonder if Ferguson would similarly de-legitimize the entirety of Catholic social teaching.  Thomas Aquinas, another childless man who wrote on economics, argued for just wage and against predatory pricing, and his writings lay the foundation for the development of Catholic social justice teaching.  Monsignor John Ryan, again childless, modernized and expanded upon such teachings for the industrial age in the Progressive Era and was one of the most prominent social reformers in New York City at the time.  According to Ferguson, neither of them could have had any regard for future generations because they produced no children of their own.

Continuing that thread, would Ferguson also say that the historical figure Joshua ben Joseph, known as Jesus, whose moral teachings are regarded by his followers, adherents of other faiths, and non-believers alike, could have had no regard for future generations because he had no children?

Additionally, I've often thought that Keynes's artistic bent had a positive connection to his economic thought.  Full employment, a prime objective of Keynes's economic thought and policy recommendations, is essential if one wants to achieve a "beautiful society," rid of the stains of poverty and hunger.  A society that achieves full employment will certainly improve the lives of the next generation by improving the current lives of their forbears.

But why argue with a troll?  

1:10 PM PT: So, apparently, a few hours ago, Niall Ferguson issued an apology on his website:  I'm guessing that his bosses at Harvard forced him into doing so.  I find the art of the public apology to be rather amusing.  There are cases in which you say something that is misinterpreted, and in those cases, an apology is necessary to return to mutual understanding.  But when you say something that is both offensive and logically unsound--in front of a large group of people--you probably meant it.

The most hilarious part of his apology is the line "I detest all prejudice," a comment belied by his neo-imperialism and neoconservatism.

Originally posted to Liberty Equality Fraternity and Trees on Sat May 04, 2013 at 09:15 AM PDT.

Also republished by Keynesian Kossacks.

Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags


More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site