Everything here is true.
However, Hicks also upsets the carefully laid steps by which the prosecution had established that Trump’s actions were all about the campaign, and not concerned with protecting his personal reputation. She also goes beyond other witnesses, who had painted Cohen as irritating and anxious, to suggest that he had “gone rogue” and was acting on his own.
Ultimately, a lot of proving that Trump committed the felonies he is charged with may well come down to Trump’s word vs. Cohen’s and Hicks did not make picking a side in that lie v. lie any easier. What her sometimes emotional testimony left with the jury, I can’t say.
Anyway, I hope that Weissmann is the wiser man in this evaluation and that I’m simply wrong.
What’s the one best thing that Hicks gave to prosecutors? Probably this: "I’d say that would be out of character for Michael.”
That was Hicks’ response when asked about Trump telling her that Cohen had paid Daniels out of the goodness of his heart. It may not sound like it, but that’s Hicks’ way of saying that she thought Trump was lying to her.
Back on Monday with all new witnesses and another week of Trump “resting his eyes.”