I posted an Andrew Sullivan blogposting yesterday on Facebook that read:
We forget that McCain has no executive experience, just as Obama has no executive experience. But in terms of judgment, of selection of a running mate, of calm in crisis, of a smooth operation, it is McCain who is revealing his total inexperience and unreadiness for the job, not Obama. In fact, there is no comparison. One campaign is chaotic, secretive, impulsive, unpredictable and losing. The other is supremely well-run, as transparent as a campaign can be, unflappable, very predictable, and winning. I know which man I'd prefer to be runing the country in a crisis. Not hotheaded, mercurial, impulsive, gambling McCain.
A friend of mine - the same Australian conservative I have written about before - felt that Andrew was being biased, and said:
It would be completely accurate to point out that McCain has vastly more judicial experince [sic] than Obama.
I am about to demonstrate that "more" experience isn't necessarily "better" experience.
Read More