A big thing at stake in the debate over a free, open internet like we've had on terrestrial internet service for a while and a closed, sectioned off internet like cellphone internet was back before iPhones and Androids has been prioritization of traffic and what it means for freedom. There are those who want the FCC or Congress to mandate that there's no prioritization so that a carrier like verizon can't make youtube artificially slow for their subscribers so you'd have to watch a pay on demand streaming thing instead. Or that an ISP with certain political leanings didn't favor their allies blogs over their rivals. There are carriers and ISP's who argue they need to be able to prioritize and throttle traffic to keep their networks operable and raise the cash to build out more infrastructure.
Verizon and Google's proposed compromise didn't really address these concerns to the satisfaction of people who are advocating for the sake of free speech and online democracy.
So, I propose to take a stab at it myself. I am online politically and happen to be a big nerd who does IT. I can see both sides of the coin. I'm not a netroots superstar or Vint Cerf, but I know enough about the respective issues to tell the kernels from the bullcrap.
Read More