He had Michael Rogers on, the guy who is outing gays in high positions.
O'Reilly called this a "sleazy tactic".
But when Mr. Rogers reminded Mr. O that O'Reilly himself had outed a MA judge on his program, O'Reilly's rambling response was:
I didn't do anything. Our guests.. our guests.. We have done many reports, and the guests that came on put it into the perspective that... We didn't do anything. In fact, we have a call in to the judge, she can come in any time she wants. If we got it wrong, we're absolutely willing to have it.
Hmm.. an air-tight denial to be sure. He managed to only trail off 2 or 3 times. Ofcourse Rogers answered with the obvious response:
I'll say the same thing to any of these directors of these organizations who are working against their own communities.
Which didn't appease O'Reilly. So, did a previous guest bring up the judge's sexuality, or did O'Reilly? Here is the first mention by O'Reilly that I can find of this "lesbian judge". It occured last November, before the Massachusetts court had even sent down it's decision:
Read More