Apparently.
Apparently, Obama "dismisses" things and there are "concerns" and there is "fallout."
I cannot believe how many seemingly innocuous statements all seem to point to "problems" with the Obama campaign. Interestingly, these "problems" are always vary and are never substantive. We are told that there are problems for the black community (if he succeeds, will people become unconcerned with racism? ). The entire story of his campaign is framed in possible negatives. Even his "Obamanomics" cover in the magazine has the words "taxation" and the words "debt" more visible than any positive words concerning the economy. Come to think of it, all the words were negative.
The culprit? The New York Times.
Sure, there have been negative McCain stories. However, these stories usually report something more substantive. With Obama, there is a disconnect between the words used and the actual facts of the story. It seems that even when Obama succeeds the words used are conditional and denote uncertainty.
Well, there you have it. Now, I will get more positive and watch the convention.
God I hope we are watching the next president of the U.S. If so, it won't be because of the "liberal media."
